OK, I had a thread going here on the forums about my situation with subwoofers and i had decided to go with a vented enclosure. i have changed back to Infinite baffle so....
its T time, and this is what i have decided to do although i have said i was NOT going to do this.
Im going infinite baffle!
(1) because as i have toyed around and learned more about winisd i have found the tools useful on paper and i want to see just how close they model to real life.
(2) Infinite baffle Output is pretty much spot on with the the vented design with the most output in the bass region that i could come up with WITH THE CORRECT EQ APPLIED, by the way that thing has enough boost built in to pound like a jackhammer off of 1 watt much less the 1500 i am supplying it with at 2 ohms. (obviously i know it wont get 1500 all the time) AND i did take it past 50hz to 80hz lowpass and apply the same flat (ironically boosted to flat) eq there as at 25hz roughly, the difference i ended up with between vented and IB was so miniscule its not even worth the enclosure build.
(3)Its going to be so much easier to just build a damn good baffle, rather than a 16ft cubic ft ported design that will have to be custom molded to every contour of my van to save as much space as possible and i would still need to come up with a port design ... because im overboard and want even the port to match the shape of the design (no plain square or circular ports)
so here is my max output and TFM graph, im giving it all i have on paper or better yet in winisd, to get an approximation of what i can do with dsp in the car, dsp in the car should work even better than this if i have my thinking cap on here. I know my cabin gain frequency, or around about it, and i have built around it. Example is i didnt need much boost in the lower bass frequencies and that helps a lot when trying to limit cone excursion, and as far as cone excursion goes im not that concerned in fact i bet the SI ht18v3 actually has way more in it because that is LINEAR cone excursion and my guess is that most people ride around listening to music with the subwoofer way past linear excursion because of how easy it would be to miss a little bit of distortion in a noisy car environment..(and they use bass boost on a head unit)
So here goes, about to try this , sawdust /glue/fiberglass jelly/vinyl possibly... long weekend/job ahead wish me luck!
p.s. One of the graphs below is vented and one is IB... without anything but looking at the graph guess which one lol. I know some of you could actually tell by the graph but some couldnt.
its T time, and this is what i have decided to do although i have said i was NOT going to do this.
Im going infinite baffle!
(1) because as i have toyed around and learned more about winisd i have found the tools useful on paper and i want to see just how close they model to real life.
(2) Infinite baffle Output is pretty much spot on with the the vented design with the most output in the bass region that i could come up with WITH THE CORRECT EQ APPLIED, by the way that thing has enough boost built in to pound like a jackhammer off of 1 watt much less the 1500 i am supplying it with at 2 ohms. (obviously i know it wont get 1500 all the time) AND i did take it past 50hz to 80hz lowpass and apply the same flat (ironically boosted to flat) eq there as at 25hz roughly, the difference i ended up with between vented and IB was so miniscule its not even worth the enclosure build.
(3)Its going to be so much easier to just build a damn good baffle, rather than a 16ft cubic ft ported design that will have to be custom molded to every contour of my van to save as much space as possible and i would still need to come up with a port design ... because im overboard and want even the port to match the shape of the design (no plain square or circular ports)
so here is my max output and TFM graph, im giving it all i have on paper or better yet in winisd, to get an approximation of what i can do with dsp in the car, dsp in the car should work even better than this if i have my thinking cap on here. I know my cabin gain frequency, or around about it, and i have built around it. Example is i didnt need much boost in the lower bass frequencies and that helps a lot when trying to limit cone excursion, and as far as cone excursion goes im not that concerned in fact i bet the SI ht18v3 actually has way more in it because that is LINEAR cone excursion and my guess is that most people ride around listening to music with the subwoofer way past linear excursion because of how easy it would be to miss a little bit of distortion in a noisy car environment..(and they use bass boost on a head unit)
So here goes, about to try this , sawdust /glue/fiberglass jelly/vinyl possibly... long weekend/job ahead wish me luck!
p.s. One of the graphs below is vented and one is IB... without anything but looking at the graph guess which one lol. I know some of you could actually tell by the graph but some couldnt.