shiva gets my vote easy
Describe "generic" in regards to the W6 motor. So even if it's more linear than the others, since JL did not put a name to their technology that means its not as good? The v2 shares nothing with the previous version.The only motor in that list that has a likely chance of competing with the Shiva's XBL^2 motor is the IA Flatlyne's underhung motor. Underhung motors are actually my favorite, but that doesn't make all of them better than all non-underhung motors. And given IA's poor, immature marketing style and their refusal to help the community get some useful, objective data about their products, I will NOT buy their stuff.
That, in my mind, leaves the Shiva-X2 as my product of choice by FAR.
The IDQ is definitely not bad but it has a generic motor that lacks the linear stroke of the XBL^2 (though it does have a decent amount).
I have a Fi Q12 D2 in my car right now and I will say this: AVOID. Gah. I hate this thing. I hope to replace it really soon.
I haven't had W6v2s but I did used to run 12w6s and they were decent, but they also have pretty generic motors. Never heard those Memphis subs. Not too experienced with Memphis stuff.
Okay, it's an overhung piece of crap, with no technology like XBL^2 in it to make up for the fact that it's not underhung.Describe "generic" in regards to the W6 motor. So even if it's more linear than the others, since JL did not put a name to their technology that means its not as good?
Here we go. Show me these facts that show the W6 is "not even close to as linear as the Shiva". Or "the Shiva has as much linear xmax as the W6v2 has xmech". Do you know the xmech of the W6 or are you just guessing? "I strongly believe the JL to be overrating it by using a different method as opposed to the 30% down". You believe? What makes you believe this?Okay, it's an overhung piece of crap, with no technology like XBL^2 in it to make up for the fact that it's not underhung.
Happy?
Agree or not, it is a FACT that it is not even CLOSE to as linear as the Shiva. About 50% more rated Xmax from the Shiva, and I strongly believe the JL to be overrating it by using a different method as opposed to the "30% down on the BL curve" method. I bet the Shiva has as much linear Xmax as the W6v2 has Xmech.
If you love the sound of the 12w6v2 then I'm not going to tell you that you should use something else, but the Shiva is objectively the more advanced, more capable, lower distortion of the two.
Haha. I totally agree with this. I once considered a Sundown sub, but I got to looking on their site for some T/S parameters, and uhhh, they omit some of them, either on purpose, or they just don't know. How am I supposed to model it? I can convert the lame 2.83V sensitivity ratings, but no Xmax? No sale.And given IA's poor, immature marketing style and their refusal to help the community get some useful, objective data about their products, I will NOT buy their stuff.
they list everything where they sell themHaha. I totally agree with this. I once considered a Sundown sub, but I got to looking on their site for some T/S parameters, and uhhh, they omit some of them, either on purpose, or they just don't know. How am I supposed to model it? I can convert the lame 2.83V sensitivity ratings, but no Xmax? No sale.
Edit: And, btw, misspelled words on companys' websites is a turn off too. Seriously, no spell check before posting what you intend to lure me to your products with? lol
Edit #2: I just looked again to make sure I'm not railing needlessly, and Sundown doesn't even list a sensitivity rating of any kind. How weak.
Fine, I'll do the work for you. You should really learn how to do this.Here we go. Show me these facts that show the W6 is "not even close to as linear as the Shiva". Or "the Shiva has as much linear xmax as the W6v2 has xmech". Do you know the xmech of the W6 or are you just guessing? "I strongly believe the JL to be overrating it by using a different method as opposed to the 30% down". You believe? What makes you believe this?
budget subs dont tend to be top SQ contenders would be my guessWheres the RE
Their whole line doesnt consist of budget minded subs. Maybe a little more orientated around spl but they are not all budget to my knowledge.budget subs dont tend to be top SQ contenders would be my guess
ok so why spend same amount as another known sq sub for a sub that is more oriented around spl? seems like u might be happy, but unless its cheaper wouldnt in my eyes be a better buy or a buy worth a tryTheir whole line doesnt consist of budget minded subs. Maybe a little more orientated around spl but they are not all budget to my knowledge.
Alright, smartass. I know the xmax on both.Fine, I'll do the work for you. You should really learn how to do this.
JL Audio 12W6v2 Subwoofers - Car Audio Subwoofers
One-Way, Linear Excursion (Xmax)*: 0.65 in. / 16.5 mm
https://www.diycable.com/main/produ...s_id=693&Cid=a851d42ee1e983e8604757979a1703d3
X-max: 26mm
It's not impossible for the JL w6v2 to have Xmech more than 50% higher than Xmax, but I doubt it. Feel free to ignore this statement if you want, but the Shiva has 50% more linear excursion.
AND
Also from JL's site, "Xmax specifications are derived via one-way voice coil overhang method with no correction factors applied. "
as opposed to BL/Kms curves. If they rated it the same way Exodus did, it would be less. .3 down on BL/Kms will give a lower Xmax number than coil overhang.
Okay, so by your own claim, it has 2mm more Xmech than Shiva has Xmax. Wow!Alright, smartass. I know the xmax on both.
I found the W6s xmech once and it was waaay higher than the xmax. I want to say it was around 28mm one way.
You don't agree with me so I'm biased? What did I assume? I quoted JL's own site. The "coil in the gap" method is not a good way to measure linear excursion.You're so biased you base your whole argument on assumptions in order to make JL products look bad. Your quote above about the xmax specs are purely assumption.
Excuse me? Unlike myself?Unlike yourself, only looking at specs on a product (and only one spec at that),
Way to be optimistic. Why are you ordering what I recommend and then being a complete ass to me about recommending it?I can't wait to see if this xbl2 technology lives up to your hype, I have a feeling I'm going to be disappointed. Technology is great but my ears have the final say. Some people hate things they can't afford.
Okay, so by your own claim, it has 2mm more Xmech than Shiva has Xmax. Wow!
Every time JL is mentioned you beat it down. If you had numbers or or better yet if you had listening experience of each one you mention I couldn't say much about it. Unfortunately you base which one will sound better by which one has the xbl2 motor and which one doesn't. There are just a couple other things that make good sound lol.You don't agree with me so I'm biased? What did I assume? I quoted JL's own site. The "coil in the gap" method is not a good way to measure linear excursion.
Excuse me? Unlike myself?
This is what you don't get. I've never said the Shiva and Tempest are not great drivers. I'm sure they are. In fact it's not really about how good or bad they are, it's about the reasons why you say they are so good or the W6 is so bad. I hope they sound great. I hope they sound better than the W6 but I have my doubts. I figured what better way to find out than to order a couple.Way to be optimistic. Why are you ordering what I recommend and then being a complete ass to me about recommending it?
We'll see about that. If you're right, I'll have no problem admitting it but I have my doubts based solely on it's xbl2 motor. Now that I'm on your ignore list I assume you will not be responding no matter what I say....:gossip: :laugh:You're now on my ignore list. But enjoy your Tempests because they are MUCH better drivers than W6s. MUCH.