Joined
·
2,298 Posts
I've got a 6.5", 4", and tweeter in each of my front doors, I'm swapping out my current 6.5s for Peerless SLS 830946s when they show up, and I'd like to fix another issue while I'm redoing my baffles for the slightly larger midbass drivers- My 6.5" and 4" are both running IB, and I'd like to enclose one of them to keep the rear waves from interfering with each other.
Madisound recommends a vented .4 cube enclosure for the SLS, but that's for an F3 of 44Hz and these won't be playing below 65 or so.
The 4" might be easier to enclose but I don't know how large of an enclosure to make for a dedicated mid- playing roughly 300Hz-3.3KHz.
Would it be better to keep the SLS IB, or the midrange IB??
I'm tempted to try XTC foam baffles for the 4"s, but everyone seems to hate those. Most of the negatives I've heard about the XTC baffles have been about losing bass response though, which won't be an issue with a 4" mid.
Specifics:
'04 Tahoe.
a/d/s/ PX tweet (minus housing).
a/d/s/ 344is midrange.
(currently) a/d/s/ 336is 6.5", soon to be replaced with Peerless SLS 6.5".
Somewhat deadened doors.
Visual:
Thanks in advance!
-Cory.
Madisound recommends a vented .4 cube enclosure for the SLS, but that's for an F3 of 44Hz and these won't be playing below 65 or so.
The 4" might be easier to enclose but I don't know how large of an enclosure to make for a dedicated mid- playing roughly 300Hz-3.3KHz.
Would it be better to keep the SLS IB, or the midrange IB??
I'm tempted to try XTC foam baffles for the 4"s, but everyone seems to hate those. Most of the negatives I've heard about the XTC baffles have been about losing bass response though, which won't be an issue with a 4" mid.
Specifics:
'04 Tahoe.
a/d/s/ PX tweet (minus housing).
a/d/s/ 344is midrange.
(currently) a/d/s/ 336is 6.5", soon to be replaced with Peerless SLS 6.5".
Somewhat deadened doors.
Visual:

Thanks in advance!
-Cory.