DIYMobileAudio.com Car Stereo Forum banner

Dayton Reference rs52 dome mid

27K views 116 replies 49 participants last post by  splicer  
#1 ·
Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image


Dome mids really have a special place in car audio. Being self-enclosed, you don't have to worry about trying to stuff a driver into too small of an enclosure, and the resulting heavy low end resonances which can muddy up the midrange. It's also nice to have a solid 90dbwm+ sensitivity, rather than the traditional low 80's you'd see from your typical 3-4" mid.

My favorite dome mid coming into this review was the Usher silk dome. It had an excellent mix of detail and body and was well built. I have to say that I have a new favorite now, and it's the Dayton rs52.

The rs52 is well built, with a large aluminum rear chamber and flange, and a copper shorting ring above the pole. Clarity and realism is unbelievable, and among the best I've heard to date in a dome mid (or cone above ~600hz). I also felt that coloration was extremely low, and not nearly as cold sounding as some titanium and aluminum domes I've tested before. Notching the breakup above 10khz yielded a slightly more neutral presentation that I doubt many would notice in their cars. Some may even prefer the brighter, more detailed sound from not filtering it.

If I had to pick something I didn't like, it would be the low end dynamics... although it's certainly arguable that domes weren't designed to play optimally below ~500-600hz. There is a slight amount of resonance in the rear chamber and the driver audibly breaks up when pushed hard. For car use, I'd recommend no lower than a 4th order highpass at 300-400hz. For those that push their drivers hard or have an extremely discriminating ear, 600hz would be more ideal.
 
#5 ·
Nice. My only complaint of the Ushers was the size of the flange/width of the motor. These look much more compact and caraudio friendly.
These look like a bargain for me to try a 4way active front plus sub:)
Leave the lower midrange to my 4's and xover those RS's to play from their sweet range up.
 
#6 · (Edited)
3.5max6spd said:
Nice. My only complaint of the Ushers was the size of the flange/width of the motor. These look much more compact and caraudio friendly.
USHER - 5-7/8" flange, 4-1/2" cutout, 1-3/8" depth
DAYTON - 5-1/8" flange, 4-1/8" cutout, 2-1/8" depth

Damn! Still too large to fit on my A-Pillars. Although, i like the Idea of using a sealed back mid up there over say the TRIUS(TG9) in the pillar in too small of an enclosure.

I just don't like the idea of a big speaker on the pillar. You get visual reflections off of the windshield as well.

Car audio is not easy!
 
#11 ·
Taking an inch off the faceplate wouldn't work too well... at that point you'd basically just have a faceplate connected to the rear chamber/motor, with no way to mount the speaker... unless you lathed down most of the faceplate and left a couple of tabs extending outside the rear chamber diameter I don't think it would work... would be better off rear mounting them.
 
#13 ·
Right, except that 2" is too small for the surround to fit, and if you want the grill also you need to drill another groove for it to sit in... I found that 2 7/8 inches works perfectly for the grill hole, and 2 9/16 works perfectly for the opening.
I don't have access to a good camera right now, but I took a couple quick pics with my cell phone to show how it looks when finished... I'll take better ones later.
 

Attachments

#16 ·
You have to remove the faceplate, and then hit it out with something from the back side to break the glue joint. I used the back side of a screwdriver with a fairly large rubber handle... left a couple dents in each one, but unless you look at them from profile or up real close they are unnoticeable, and even then they aren't too bad. No damage to the coloring or anything. If you had a rubber ball about the size of the opening and stuck that in there and hit it from behind you would have better results with no dents I'd assume, but I didn't have anything like that laying around.
 
#23 ·
What would a good xover point between the RS52 and an RS225, in a tower for home audio duty :D.........Either an LPG 26nafm or Neo 3 on the top end.

Possibly might be off topic but does the RS52 work well in home being a dome as well as in a car, but with a low enough ~6k or so before beaming may start would it be a good point for the tweet, and down low possibly around 400hz, mabey 500hz then the RS225 play down to a good 40 or 50hz, dual tempest sonotubes down low.
 
#25 ·
i'm considering these mids for my qforms crossed between 1khz and around 5khz. here's the catch...my tires are allterrains and my magnaflow exhaust really bellers when driving around town but is whisper quiet on the hwy up to about 65mph. do you think these dayton domes could keep up and at least get up to near painful listening levels without selfdestructing if crossed high enough? with the loud truck and my hearing being somewhat shot i need whatever i get to be loud and fairly bright.