DIYMobileAudio.com Car Stereo Forum banner

Focal Flax 2-way speakers hurting my ears

1 reading
22K views 48 replies 27 participants last post by  Ziggyrama  
#1 ·
Car: 2013 Toyota Camry
Head unit: Alpine CDE-W265BT
Speakers: 2 sets of Focal Flax 2-ways, front and back. Front tweeters in sail panels, back tweeters mounted next to woofers. Passive crossovers are being used.
Amp: Alpine PDR-F50
Subwoofers: 2 Alpine Type-R 12's in a ported box
Subwoofer Amp: JL Audio 1000w monoblock
Trunk and front doors have sound dampening.
Install was professionally done by a highly reputable dealer in Nor Cal.

I've had these speakers in my car for a few months and despite EQ tweaking, they hurt my ears consistently even at lower volumes. At first I thought it was sibilance with esses and snares, but cutting those frequencies (1k, 2k, 7k, 8k, 10k) only seems to muddy up the sound, not fix the piercing sonic pain.

Some people I've talked to suggest that it is the recordings themselves causing the issue, which I can agree with to a degree, but I don't experience this same level of painful assault from other speakers.

Here are a few random albums that hurt:

The new New Order album
The new Birds and the Bee album
The new Peaches album
Crystal Method - Vegas album
Dr. Dre - Compton album (although this is known to be harsh)
The new Leftfield album
The new Jamie XX album

Overall, the issue appears on music of all different styles.

Others have suggested this is a crossover issue and that I need to go active or attenuate the tweeters. I understand that is something I could try, but I would have to spend a lot more money to go active, which, at that point, maybe I should just switch these out for some different speakers.

Has anyone else experienced issues like this before, or own a pair of the flax series that doesn't hurt?
 
#3 ·
that would be my first step as well. I've never been a fan of focal tweeters except the eutopia b ones but I think you should be able to get a sound you like overall even with them.
 
#5 ·
Focal tweeters in general seem to be pretty notorious for being a bit harsh. I didn't have the Flax tweeters, but I did have a Focal PS 165 component set where I swapped the tweeters out for a set of ScanSpeak D3004s, and it made a world of difference in terms of cutting down the harshness and brightness without losing clarity. I was also able to cross them over a little lower, too. Plus, they work very well with the 6.5" Focal woofers. I am running active, however, but swapping out the tweeters might be something to consider if your budget allows for it.
 
#9 ·
They hurt my ears for a while too. After they broke in and I put an rta on them to tune in really enjoying them. I think what's hurting you has nothing to do with the tweeters. The upper midrange on the woofer can get rough. If you cut on that dome these speakers become very full and warm . I found a slight downward eq curve seems to suit them best.
 
#11 ·
Thanks everyone for the responses so far. I do agree with drop1, I think it is more of an upper midrange issue vs. tweeter, but am not 100% sure on that. I talked to an Orca rep awhile ago and it seems that the crossover frequency for the tweeters are above where I perceive the issue to be. It's hard to be certain though, as I obviously haven't fixed the problem yet.

It's interesting to hear a comment about my amp. According to the specs from Focal, my amp should match up with these speakers and it was recommended by my dealer, but maybe I need a bigger beefier amp to really make them sing. I'm not opposed to that idea as upgrading to a bigger amp wouldn't necessarily be that expensive if I bought used.

That was another concern, the 9-band EQ kinda sucks compared to the EQs I'm used to using for audio production. I would like to get a processor someday, but before I go spending another grand, I want to make sure that will fix the underlying issue.
 
#13 ·
I have heard the flax 3-ways, but not the 2-ways. The flax series drivers which I have heard are some of the "least harsh" sounding Focals I've heard, and they can be controlled to sound quite nice, if presented as a singular pair positioned and tuned properly forward of the listener position.

However, if an additional pair is added, behind the listener no less, this presents a near-impossible tuning challenge for even the best of equipment, and the best of tuners for that matter.

It is no surprise to read that this configuration hurts the ears.

If the aim of this installation is superior reproduction of sound, getting rid of the rear "front stage" would be a logical first step.

Most folks neither want nor need a "rear stage", so get rid of that, unless that's what you like, of course. Invest instead on developing a singular front stage and going active.

If nothing else, this move alone should cut your pain in half.
 
#14 ·
I have heard the flax 3-ways, but not the 2-ways. The flax series drivers which I have heard are some of the "least harsh" sounding Focals I've heard, and they can be controlled to sound quite nice, if presented as a singular pair positioned and tuned properly forward of the listener position.

However, if an additional pair is added, behind the listener no less, this presents a near-impossible tuning challenge for even the best of equipment, and the best of tuners for that matter.

It is no surprise to read that this configuration hurts the ears.

If the aim of this installation is superior reproduction of sound, getting rid of the rear "front stage" would be a logical first step.

Most folks neither want nor need a "rear stage", so get rid of that, unless that's what you like, of course. Invest instead on developing a singular front stage and going active.

If nothing else, this move alone will cut your pain in half.
I can agree with this. They stage really well and once tuned to sound correct that's exactly what they do.
 
#16 · (Edited)
The rear stage should be heartily discarded... Do it, don't look back!

A rear stage will only confuse whatever goodness the front end is producing.

Honestly, it's hard enough to try tuning a single pair of satellites; don't make life so difficult as to try winning this losing battle of sitting between four of them!

Unless you are going for a full-on surround system with adequate processor to support that, fogettaboutit! ;)
 
#39 ·
^^ Exactly.

You're using thousands of dollars worth of equipment. Please don't tell me that you're running without an EQ?

This is essential; in a car it's literally impossible to get a good soundstage and smooth frequency response without EQ.
 
#19 ·
I've been using a free RTA app on my iPhone, pink noise, and have been observing the RTA while music is playing as well. I tend to see spikes around 1k, 2k, and 5k. I've lowered those frequencies and at low volumes it generally sounds ok. If I turn it up though, my ears are like 0_0.

Maybe my perceived volume of moderate is above 90db and in damaging range. I'll see if I can find a spl app for my phone or find someone with a meter to see where I'm at.

i think I'm going to look more into selling the rear stage and making the front stage active. The money from selling the rear stage could go towards a beefier amp or processor perhaps.
 
#20 ·
if you do keep the rear stage for passengers, you could put any old coaxial in there and power it off the headunits rear channels, dedicating your 4 channel amp to going active.
 
#23 ·
I would keep cutting back on 1K, ( especially, 2K ,2.5K and 3.1K) , and try 4K, 5K and 8K see if that helps. 2.5K being the worst as far as hurting my ears. Drop that as much as possible. If you have a parametric equalizer make it really fat and cut as much back as you can.

There is midrange hurt and tweeter hurt.
 
#24 ·
I measured my typical listening volumes with a free db app on my phone and realized that what I consider a moderate to quiet volume is right around 90db :/. I wonder if perhaps part of my issue is listening to music too loud. My typical volumes were never so loud as to turn heads or make my hair move, but I've noticed the pain hasn't been as bad the past couple days keeping it just below 90db. It's just not as fun :p.


Still though, even at ~90db it feels a bit sharp in the midrange. I currently have 1.2 and 2k down by -4 or -5, then the rest of the upper range at -3. The back speakers have been turned off. It's tough because while the EQing has helped a little bit with the harshness, it still doesn't quite feel like what I was expecting for the amount of money I paid for these speakers.

I'll keep tweaking the EQ some more, use the RTA app on my phone and test out different curves.
 
#27 ·
Still though, even at ~90db it feels a bit sharp in the midrange. I currently have 1.2 and 2k down by -4 or -5, then the rest of the upper range at -3. The back speakers have been turned off. It's tough because while the EQing has helped a little bit with the harshness, it still doesn't quite feel like what I was expecting for the amount of money I paid for these speakers.
Did you try swapping the polarity on tweeters? Costs nothing but little time to make the switch.. I understand if crossovers are mounted inside the doors you might want to try eq it out instead..

It's so easy to do on 80prs :D
 
#25 ·
I listen to my system usually around 95DB with some peaks over 100. On some tracks, the high guitars, audience cheering, or female vocals make me turn back the volume knob. Maybe you can try an inexpensive quick speaker swap and see if that harshness goes away? Hopefully, you can fix it with more tuning.
Kind of hindsight, but its always best to demo speakers before you shell out your hard earned $$$$. May be a costly lesson. Listen to as many systems as you can and find out what you like best. Everyones ears and tastes are different. Reviews are subjective. At least if you hear a system that you really like, you know you will not be making another gamble.
 
#28 ·
That's the thing. I demoed these speakers at the store and they sounded great. Of course, that was in a demo room.

I haven't tried switching the polarity on the tweeters yet but will look into doing that. I am also thinking of going back to the shop and using their RTA to see how it matches up to my free phone app. They have a nice unit there, or maybe I will get lucky and shop up on a day Gary is hanging out.

I might be able to work out a way to test some other speakers as well.

In the mean time, I'll keep tweaking the tuning.
 
#31 ·
I demo'd those, and the Flax 165FX were the speakers which made me reconsider Focal. I found them still on the bright side, but not nearly as punishing as anything I heard from Focal before. Anyways that does not solve your problem :) but it should be salvageable.

First, I'd disconnect the rear tweeters. If they are annoying you, less of them should be a good thing. Then, flip the -3db switch in the crossovers

http://www.focal.com/usa/en/index.php?controller=attachment&id_attachment=3970

At high volume, both speakers and amps can distort massively. With the 85wpc Alpine, you are already at what the speaker can handle. With any wattage, we are most interested at the level of distortion that comes with it. Alpine plays it safe and specs .07% THD at rated power.

The speaker looks to be pretty efficient, too: Nom. power: 80W. Sensitivity (2.83V/1m): 91.3dB
 
#33 ·
Really? That's what you're going to contribute to this discussion? :confused:
Leaving a little jab like that and walking away makes you sound like you know more than everyone else but you're not willing to teach anyone, just point out their failures and laugh.

Prove me wrong.