DIYMobileAudio.com Car Stereo Forum banner
Status
Not open for further replies.
841 - 860 of 1,726 Posts
1. Yes, SDS is the Sound Deadener Showdown CLD tiles.

2. Yes, as the thinner is called "Resonance Control"

3. Sorry, couldn't tell you, I've read through the thread myself but don't recall either.
 
Is REW ever used outside of a standing state test environment ie. @Stub's lab and generated test tones?

Would it ever be used to measure the sound inside the vehicle at rest, at idle, at 30 mph and 60 mph or some similar scenario?
 
Discussion starter · #845 ·
I wont be measuring in car. Without a wind tunnel, it would be impossible for the added variables of open road testing not to overcome the measured differences caused by a cld test, especially since cld isn't the main type of deadening used to fight road noise. A better test would be a sweep test, before and after deadening the roof, and looking at the decay times. I believe therapture has a thread like this, and it showed a big difference in decay after deadening the roof.
 
After only about a year this NVX CLD melted and slid downwards about 2 inches. It's on the outer door skin, but the ones on the inner door skin seems to be fine. Now I'm wondering how effective is this stuff.
Image
 
Did you clean the surface before you placed them on the door? thanks for sharing your experience with it.
 
Save
Discussion starter · #850 ·
I will make that the next product I heat test. On vibration damping testing, it performed in the mid range, near dynamat/dampifier pro etc.

That does look like it failed due to heat, as the adhesive is not coming off, but the butyl itself is sliding downwards.
 
I will make that the next product I heat test. On vibration damping testing, it performed in the mid range, near dynamat/dampifier pro etc.

That does look like it failed due to heat, as the adhesive is not coming off, but the butyl itself is sliding downwards.
If you need some to test, I can mail it to you. No charge. Just an fyi.
 
After only about a year this NVX CLD melted and slid downwards about 2 inches. It's on the outer door skin, but the ones on the inner door skin seems to be fine. Now I'm wondering how effective is this stuff.
Image
:eek:........no thank you.


Bret
PPI-ART COLLECTOR
 
Save
GTMat Quadro

From an objective perspective, it does work better than GTMat Onyx. However, from a purely objective standpoint, based on the measurements I have made, it is still near the bottom of the list. The only butyl that performs worse, in the vibration testing I've done, is Onyx. The next worse butyl product performed more than twice as well (a toss up between Stinger Roadkill Expert and Raamat BXT2).
Why do you think that the Quadro isn't much better than the Onyx? I know you have the data but there's the additional foam in the Quadro that seems like it should get some CLD-type results. I was thinking of getting either the Onyx or the Quadro until I read your impressive write-ups TOOSTUBBORN2FAIL. Nice work!

I'm completely new to sound/vibration dampening but want to reduce the road/exhaust noise for my kids in the back seat of my wrx. I've read several different forum threads but it looks like there are different recommendations based on the desired result, like better stereo sound or reduced rattling. My main goal is to make a modified wrx sound more like a tesla in the back seat. What do the experts recommend?

Thanks!
 
Discussion starter · #857 ·
Why do you think that the Quadro isn't much better than the Onyx? I know you have the data but there's the additional foam in the Quadro that seems like it should get some CLD-type results. I was thinking of getting either the Onyx or the Quadro until I read your impressive write-ups TOOSTUBBORN2FAIL. Nice work!

I'm completely new to sound/vibration dampening but want to reduce the road/exhaust noise for my kids in the back seat of my wrx. I've read several different forum threads but it looks like there are different recommendations based on the desired result, like better stereo sound or reduced rattling. My main goal is to make a modified wrx sound more like a tesla in the back seat. What do the experts recommend?

Thanks!

The main thing is the results tell the story. If the foam was doing something to help damp vibration, it would have shown up in the results. Quadro is better than onyx, but there are many better products for close to the same price, and by better I mean significantly better.


In order to quiet it as much as can be done, you need to deal with vibration first, which will be covered by cld. Anything past 25% is into the realm of diminished returns, but, that's not to say that performance gains can't be had with more coverage. You have to on a person to person basis experiment and decide if its worth the cost.

After that, you absolutely need a decoupling layer like closed cell foam, and then a mass loaded barrier. This can be any continuous barrier that is thin enough to fit in between your carpet/panels and the closed cell foam. Both the foam and barrier need to be 100% coverage to be most effective. Shoot for something with at least 1 pound per square foot, which is what the MLV everyone uses is around. That said, you could be adventurous, and use lead. Cascade Audio sells just this, 15mil lead sheet sandwiched between two layers of closed cell foam. You could fit two layers of this stuff where one layer of closed cell foam and mlv would fit. But, it will be heavy, at 2 pounds per square foot. It would be noticeably better than one layer though.
 
any testing with the GP deadener? really curious to see how that performs.
 
Save
any testing with the GP deadener? really curious to see how that performs.
Tstf hasn't pmd me about the sample... I pmd him about it.
 
Save
Im really interested in the results of the BQuiet Ultimate. Its half the price per sq ft of most of the name brand stuff, and seems to have similar specs.
 
Save
841 - 860 of 1,726 Posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.